historybriefs
13:00in productionCh. 1 · A nomadic people who settled and built/ 13:00 · ceiling 15 min
Ancient · Empires & states

Petra

800 BC

Its famous carved facade was long assumed to be a treasury; its actual original name, lost until 1964, turned out to mean simply 'the coloured one.'

The Nabataeans, an Arab people whose origins scholars no longer trace to Aramean roots, built Petra into a thriving trading city that reached a population of roughly twenty thousand in the century before Rome annexed it in 106. A 1964 discovery of Nabataean inscriptions established the city's original name as Raqmu, and after earthquake damage and the decline of the trade routes it depended on, Petra faded from written record by the seventh century until the Swiss traveller Johann Ludwig Burckhardt, disguised as a local, rediscovered it for European scholarship in 1812.

AncientEmpires & statesTradeThe Middle AgesTrade across the network →
Chapters & takeaways6
  1. 0:08
    A nomadic people who settled and built

    The Nabataeans, generally identified as northern Arabian rather than Aramean in origin, transformed a nomadic background into a settled trading city.

  2. 2:10
    A name lost for centuries and found on stone

    Nabataean funerary inscriptions discovered only in 1964 confirmed the city's original name as Raqmu.

  3. 4:20
    Water engineering behind the desert city

    Excavated dams, cisterns and conduits reveal sophisticated water management that let Petra thrive in an arid environment.

  4. 6:30
    Annexed rather than conquered outright

    Rome absorbed the Nabataean kingdom in 106, folding Petra into the province of Arabia Petraea.

  5. 8:40
    Papyri that outlasted the city's prominence

    A cache of sixth-century documents found at Petra shows the city remained a functioning urban centre well after its commercial peak had passed.

  6. 10:50
    Rediscovered in disguise

    Johann Ludwig Burckhardt reintroduced Petra to European scholarship in 1812 only by posing as a local traveller to gain access.

Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

4/ 5
What works
  • it credits the specific 1964 discovery that resolved the city's original name
  • it separates commercial decline from military conquest as distinct causes of Petra's fading importance
What does not
  • it does not resolve the disputed biblical identification of the site
Study it if
  • readers who want the archaeological and textual detective work behind recovering the city's real name
  • anyone interested in how a trading city's decline can be traced to shifting routes rather than conquest
Skip it if
  • readers wanting a settled answer on whether Petra corresponds to a specific biblical location
The written brief3 min read

A nomadic people who settled and built

The Nabataeans, described in the historical record as a nomadic Arab people, settled in the Petra region by the fourth century BC, following earlier Edomite occupation of the area during the Iron Age. The city reached its commercial and architectural peak in the century leading up to Roman annexation, when its population reached an estimated twenty thousand and structures including the elaborately carved facade known as Al-Khazneh, possibly built as the mausoleum of King Aretas IV, were constructed. Rome formally annexed the Nabataean kingdom in 106 under the governor Aulus Cornelius Palma Frontonianus, incorporating Petra into the province of Arabia Petraea rather than destroying it through conquest.

A name lost for centuries and found on stone

Much of what is known about Petra’s history and identity comes from a combination of physical excavation and epigraphic discovery rather than continuous written record. Archaeological work has revealed sophisticated water management systems, dams, cisterns and conduits, demonstrating advanced engineering that allowed a substantial urban population to thrive in an arid environment. The city’s original name remained unknown to modern scholarship until 1964, when Nabataean-script funerary inscriptions discovered at the site confirmed it as Raqmu, a name that had not survived in any of the Greek, Roman or biblical references to the city that had been known previously.

Water engineering behind the desert city

Petra’s Nabataean origins are themselves a point of settled correction within scholarship: theories once proposing Aramean roots for the Nabataeans are now rejected by most modern scholars, who instead identify them as a northern Arabian tribal group, a shift reflecting closer analysis of linguistic and cultural evidence uncovered through both archaeology and comparison with surviving Nabataean inscriptions. The city’s commercial prominence rested on its position along trade routes carrying goods across the region, a position that made it wealthy while it lasted but also left it vulnerable once those trade patterns shifted elsewhere in later centuries.

Annexed rather than conquered outright

Some questions about Petra’s early history remain genuinely unresolved: an account of Antigonus’s expedition against the Nabataeans in 312 BC has been read by some scholars as implying no substantial town yet existed at the site at that time, suggesting Petra’s full urban development may postdate this earlier period, though this interpretation is not universally settled. Separately, scholars continue to debate whether Petra corresponds to the biblical site referred to as Sela, a Hebrew term that simply means rock and could plausibly describe multiple locations, leaving the specific biblical identification of Petra an open rather than resolved question.

Papyri that outlasted the city’s prominence

Petra’s decline followed a combination of factors rather than a single cause: a major earthquake in 363 damaged the city considerably, while the growing importance of sea-based trade routes and competition from the rival city of Palmyra undermined the commercial advantage Petra had previously held. Even so, a cache of Byzantine-era documents known as the Petra papyri, dating from the 530s to 590s and comprising some 140 documents, demonstrates that the city remained a functioning urban centre well into the sixth century, well after its peak, before finally fading from written records by the seventh century. European rediscovery came only in 1812, when the Swiss traveller Johann Ludwig Burckhardt gained access to the site by disguising himself as a local visitor.

Rediscovered in disguise

This is a strong subject for readers who want to see how a name, an origin, and a decline can each be reconstructed from different kinds of evidence, inscriptions for the name, archaeology for the engineering, papyri for the later urban life, rather than from a single continuous historical narrative. It rewards attention for that combination of physical and textual detective work. It is less satisfying if you want the disputed biblical identification of the site settled definitively, which the material leaves as a genuinely open question rather than resolving it either way.

Same strand · Ancient4 of 31
13:00
Hellenistic periodThe Hellenistic period runs conventionally from Alexander's death in 323 BC to Cleopatra VII's death in 30 BC, spanning the successor kingdoms, Ptolemaic Egypt, the Seleucid realm and Macedon among them, that emerged from the wars fought among his former generals. It was a period of active scholarship and cultural mixing, producing figures such as Euclid and Archimedes and blending Greek culture with Egyptian, Persian and other local traditions, before Rome absorbed the last of the successor states.
13:00
Alexandria331 BCAlexander the Great founded Alexandria in April 331 BC after taking Egypt from Persian control, then departed shortly afterward, leaving his successors, particularly Ptolemy I, to build it into the largest city in the world within a century through institutions including its famous library and the Pharos lighthouse, one of the ancient world's seven wonders. The library's eventual destruction, often attributed to a single dramatic event during Julius Caesar's siege in 47 BC, remains disputed among historians, and the city's long decline followed Portuguese discovery of alternative sea routes to India in the late fifteenth century.
9:59
Chandragupta MauryaChandragupta Maurya founded the first verifiable pan-Indian empire by defeating the Nandas and Greek garrisons, then securing territory through diplomacy with Seleucus. His reign (c. 320–298 BCE) established administrative reach across Gujarat, Magadha, and the Indus Valley — backed by trade-routes and cities. But chronology, Chanakya’s role, and Afghan control remain contested. This is the earliest Indian state whose scale, method, and diplomacy are attested — not mythologised.
13:00
Julius CaesarJulius Caesar rose through Roman political and military office in the first century BC, conquered Gaul in the 50s BC, and then led an army against the Senate and his former ally Pompey in a civil war that made him dictator of Rome. He was assassinated by a group of senators, including Brutus and Cassius, on the Ides of March in 44 BC. The fullest evidence for his career comes partly from his own self-justifying commentaries and partly from biographers writing more than a century later.
Up next in History

Petrarch

· 13:00

Petrarch's own famous account of climbing a mountain just for the view turns out to claim a novelty earlier medieval climbers had already managed, which says something about how carefully he built his own legend.

Play nextBack to Ancient
13:00